Evidence mapPaperPMID 42533019Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026

Clinical toxicity of ADCs and ICI-ADC combinations: mechanisms, patterns and management.

Solange Peters, Petros Grivas, Christophe Massard, Sara M Tolaney, Michel Obeid

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Solange PetersMedical Oncology Service, Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Petros GrivasDivision of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3965-3394
Christophe MassardDrug Development Department (DITEP), Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Sara M TolaneyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5940-8671
Michel ObeidImmunology and Allergy Service, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), LCIT center, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. michel.obeid@chuv.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reshaped cancer therapy both as monotherapy and in combination. However, these drug classes have toxicity profiles that, despite arising from different biological mechanisms, often converge on the same organs. Given that ICI-ADC combinations are moving into earlier lines of treatment, including curative-intent settings, clinicians increasingly face overlapping pulmonary, hepatic, gastrointestinal and cutaneous adverse events with uncertain attribution, and the management of toxicities during the acute event and subsequent treatment resumption and the management of rechallenge after toxicity resolution remain variable. In this Review, we propose a unified, mechanism-informed framework that links three interacting layers: immune activation, payload cytotoxicity and payload-independent effects (from target, platform and host-related determinants). We compare organ-level patterns across major payload classes, highlight consistent organ signatures and provide practical algorithms for evaluation, initial management and treatment resumption in patients receiving ADC monotherapy or ICI-ADC combinations. Finally, we propose minimum reporting standards to harmonize toxicity phenotyping and enable cross-trial comparisons, biomarker discovery and the development of safer regimens.

Identifiers

PMID42533019

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.