ReviewNature aging2026
Agentic AI for scaling diagnosis and care in neurodegenerative disease.
Review in Nature aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
US healthcare systems are struggling to meet the growing demand for neurological care, particularly in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) built on large language models now enables agentic AI systems that can streamline clinical workflows, integrate multimodal data and learn from practicing specialists. We envision an agentic AI system that scales specialist-level care to nonspecialist clinical settings through a continuously learning healthcare system. We describe this destination and outline a phased roadmap for responsible design and integration into care of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: (1) high-quality standardized data collection across modalities; (2) decision support; (3) clinical integration enhancing workflows; (4) rigorous validation and monitoring protocols; (5) continuous learning through clinical feedback; and (6) robust ethics and risk management frameworks. This human-centered approach optimizes clinicians' capabilities in comprehensive data collection, interpretation of complex clinical information and timely application of relevant medical knowledge while prioritizing patient safety, healthcare equity and transparency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42533108What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.