In one paragraphArticle in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
18 authors.
Trang CaoTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. trang.cao@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4000-8931 James C PangTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-2760 Mehul GajwaniTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Ashlea SegalTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Alexander HolmesCentre for Integrative Neuroimaging (OxCIN), FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Joshua F WileyTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Juan Helen ZhouCentre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0180-8648 Christopher L H ChenMemory Aging and Cognition Centre, Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1047-9225 Fang JiCentre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-0115 Ben J HarrisonDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Toby ConstableTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9904-6129 Jeggan TiegoTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7835-6398 Bree HartshornTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Jessica KweeTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1094-3626 Mark A BellgroveTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0186-8349 Alex FornitoTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. alex.fornito@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9134-480X Funding
Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) DP200103509, FL220100184Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1146292, 1197431Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 2033976Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 2034000
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Decades of structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have documented alterations of gray matter morphometry in psychiatric disorders, but the field has failed to identify any consensus disease phenotypes. Here we examine whether current approaches will ever converge on such phenotypes by evaluating the consistency of brain-wide maps of gray matter volume and cortical thickness differences obtained for each of 59 study sites of five psychiatric disorders (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, autism spectrum disorder, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder), totaling 2,437 patients and 2,065 controls. We find that cross-site consistency is low (median r ≤ 0.16); markedly reduced compared to Alzheimer's disease (r = 0.54); unexplained by demographic, clinical or scanner differences; and robust to analytic choices. Using bootstrapping, we observe that consistency may improve for sample sizes ≥200 per group for schizophrenia but that other disorders may require much larger samples. Our findings indicate that current widespread practices in structural MRI are unlikely to identify robust morphometric phenotypes for psychiatric disorders.
What Socratic holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390