SynthesisBrain and behavior2026
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Poor Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high risks of mortality and disability, yet early and accurate outcome prediction remains challenging. This study systematically evaluated the performance of machine learning (ML) models in predicting key adverse outcomes (hematoma expansion [HE], poor functional outcome, mortality) in ICH, aiming to provide consolidated evidence for future research and clinical translation.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to September 2025. Studies developing and validating ML models for predicting HE, poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 3-6), or mortality in adults with spontaneous ICH were included. Pooled concordance index (C-index), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated using a random-effects or bivariate model.
resultsEighty-three studies (involving at least 136,840 patients) were included. Meta-analysis of model performance, derived predominantly from internal validation set, demonstrated that models integrating both clinical and radiomics features achieved the highest discriminative performance across key prognostic prediction tasks: predicting HE (pooled C-index 0.822, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.789-0.855), poor functional outcome (C-index 0.850, 95% CI 0.830-0.869), and mortality (C-index 0.860, 95% CI 0.809-0.911). These findings should be interpreted with caution, as true external validation remains sparse. Logistic regression exhibited performance comparable to more complex ML algorithms.
conclusionsML models, particularly integrated clinical-radiomics models, demonstrate strong performance for the prediction of outcomes in ICH. They hold significant potential to enhance risk stratification and guide personalized management, pending further validation in diverse cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.