ReviewJournal of audiology & otology2026
Age-Dependent Auditory Plasticity: Critical Periods in Subcortical and Cortical Encoding.
Review in Journal of audiology & otology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Auditory plasticity refers to the capacity of the auditory system to reorganize in response to experience and represents a fundamental feature of neural development. This scoping review synthesizes evidence on age-dependent plasticity at both subcortical and cortical levels, with a particular emphasis on critical and sensitive periods. A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases (1963-2025) was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A total of 2,437 records were screened, of which 78 studies were included in the review. Data were analyzed using thematic synthesis. Four major contributions are presented: 1) an appraisal of methodological limitations; 2) the Graded Windows Model (GWM), a conceptual framework proposing that plasticity may be organized as overlapping and interacting windows along the auditory neuraxis; 3) five testable hypotheses; and 4) clinical recommendations graded based on evidence level and study type. Human and animal evidence were distinguished. The traditional dichotomy that the brainstem matures early, whereas cortical plasticity persists later, may represent an oversimplification. Auditory plasticity appears to involve graded and hierarchically organized windows. Overall, this framework may inform the intervention timing and help prevent maladaptive plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.