ArticleJournal of diabetes research2026
Exploration of Early Biomarkers for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnant Women Living Without Obesity.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploration of Early Biomarkers for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnant Women Living Without Obesity.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) enables timely interventions but remains challenging, particularly in women living without obesity who are often overlooked by standard screening methods. This exploratory analysis identifies early pregnancy biomarkers that show associations with GDM up to 8-12 weeks earlier than the established diagnostic timeframe.
methodsA retrospective nested case-control study was conducted at Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics. After applying the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and removing cases with missing blood samples, a total of 136 women were included in the final analysis, comprising 56 women with GDM and 80 non-GDM controls. These data were used to develop multiple machine learning models, including random forest, logistic regression, SVM, XGBoost, and KNN. The performance of these models was assessed by AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in an independent validation set.
resultsThe random forest classifier achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.992 in the validation set, indicating excellent sensitivity and specificity. The model incorporated six measurable variables: age, BMI, and four cytokines (IL-1β, IL-10, IL-17A, and IL-4) participating in immune regulation in pregnancy.
conclusionsGDM can be predicted with high accuracy early in pregnancy, even among women living without obesity. This study highlights the value of integrating immunological biomarkers with clinical characteristics and machine learning for proactive risk stratification. Although promising, our findings warrant validation in larger, multiethnic cohorts to ensure generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.