ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2026
Longevity as a quality control metric for male Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): does test design matter?
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In mosquito Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) programs, adult male longevity is widely used as a quality control (QC) indicator for process monitoring and post-treatment assessment. However, longevity assays are frequently implemented using non-standardized protocols, limiting their comparability and operational interpretation. In this study, we evaluated whether and how key assay design parameters influence measured longevity and the ability of longevity-based tests to detect high dose irradiation related quality effects in male Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762). Using a factorial cage-based design, we assessed the effects of adult holding density, female presence, and observation period on male survival under standard holding conditions. Increasing density reduced male survival, primarily reflecting an assay-related stress effect. Irradiation consistently reduced longevity across all experimental conditions, while female presence imposed additional survival costs under some conditions. Combined high-density and mixed-sex environments produced the lowest overall survival but did not disproportionately amplify irradiation related effects. We also evaluated a rapid acute-stress assay conducted without access to sugar or water. Treatment-related differences were detectable during the early stages of the assay but diminished as mortality approached saturation, demonstrating that rapid stress assays are highly dependent on the timing of assessment. Together, these findings demonstrate that longevity-based QC indicators can be strongly influenced by experimental design and must be applied under standardized and purpose-specific conditions. Rapid stress assays can support routine SIT QC as targeted screening tools, but they require prior calibration and should not be considered universal proxies of overall male quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.