ArticleMeasurement in physical education and exercise science2026
Measurement Reactivity to Hip-Worn Accelerometry Among Adolescent Females: A Concurrent Wear Approach.
Article in Measurement in physical education and exercise science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Device-based measurement of physical activity (PA) is crucial for valid research, but reactivity to these devices can undermine validity. Inconsistent findings in prior reactivity research warrant unique approaches among diverse populations, including those habituated to wearing another device. We aimed to estimate reactivity to ActiGraph GT3X+ via concurrent Fitbit Inspire HR wear among Latina adolescents using a person-day matched cross-sectional design. Fitbit data estimated steps, moderate-vigorous PA, light PA, and sedentary time for all days in the 2 weeks preceding and following matched ActiGraph wear days. Linear models estimated the association of ActiGraph wear day with activity after adjustment for covariates. There were 2987 total days across 107 participants, ~35% classified as ActiGraph wear days. Steps statistically significantly differed (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.