SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Comparative efficacy of mind-body exercises on quality of life, anxiety, and depression in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Comparative evidence on the effects of different mind-body exercises (MBEs) for psychological outcomes in breast cancer patients remains limited. This study aimed to compare the effects of Yoga, Tai Chi, Qigong, Pilates, and Dance on quality of life, anxiety, and depression in breast cancer patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 31, 2026. Pairwise meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models with Hedges' g. Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted to estimate standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Ranking probabilities were summarized using SUCRA values. Risk of bias and evidence certainty were assessed using the RoB 2 tool and GRADE framework, respectively. Results: Fifty-five RCTs involving 3,770 participants were included. Network meta-analysis showed that Qigong, Dance, and Yoga significantly improved quality of life compared with control, with Qigong showing the highest ranking probability (SUCRA 83.9%). For anxiety, Dance was significantly superior to control and showed the highest ranking probability (SUCRA 90.6%). For depression, Yoga was significantly superior to control and ranked highest, closely followed by Tai Chi (SUCRA 64.3% and 64.1%, respectively). No significant differences were detected between active interventions. Exercise frequency and total dose appeared to be consistent moderators across outcomes. Overall, 55% of included trials were judged to be at high risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence was low to very low. Conclusion: Mind-body exercises may improve quality of life, anxiety, and depression in breast cancer patients. However, because no significant differences were found between active interventions and the certainty of evidence was low to very low, SUCRA rankings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than as evidence of definitive superiority. Higher exercise dose may be associated with greater improvements. Future high-quality head-to-head RCTs are needed to strengthen the evidence base. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261335679, Identifier: CRD420261335679.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.