ReviewPsychoradiology2026
fMRI-based prediction of eye gaze during naturalistic movie viewing reveals eye-movement-related brain activity.
Review in Psychoradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unique Amygdala Signatures and Shared Prefrontal Deficits in Autism: Mapping Social Heterogeneity via Naturalistic functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Eye gaze provides crucial insights into perceptual and cognitive processes during naturalistic movie viewing, yet concurrent eye tracking is often unavailable in functional MRI (fMRI) research. While deep learning models can estimate gaze directly from fMRI eyeball signals, their out-of-the-box generalizability across heterogeneous datasets requires empirical evaluation. Methods: We applied a specific pre-trained model from the DeepMReye framework in a zero-shot setting (without dataset-specific fine-tuning) to estimate gaze during movie watching across three independent fMRI datasets. Model accuracy was evaluated against camera-based eye-tracking data and via inter-subject correlations. Furthermore, we derived eye-movement-related time series from the predicted gaze signals to map their associated brain activation. Results: At the individual level, predicted gaze showed modest correspondence with measured ground-truth data ( Conclusions: Under a zero-shot implementation, the pre-trained model exhibits limitations for individual-level inference, likely reflecting the absence of dataset-specific training. However, group-averaged fMRI-based gaze estimates successfully capture shared viewing behaviors and robustly support the investigation of eye-movement-related brain activity. These findings inform the appropriate use of fMRI-based gaze decoding for naturalistic neuroimaging datasets lacking ground-truth eye-tracking logs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.