ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Touch, temperature, and relief: a multilevel integrative model of hedonic regulation in massage and thermal therapies.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Touch, massage, and thermal practices are widely used to promote relaxation, pain relief, and bodily restoration. Yet the mechanisms that make these practices feel pleasurable or restorative are usually explained in separate literatures, including somatosensory neuroscience, pain modulation, autonomic physiology, psychoneuroendocrinology, placebo research, and social psychology. This article proposes the Multilevel Integrative Model of Hedonic Regulation (MIHR) as a conceptual framework for linking these domains. The model synthesizes established findings on tactile and thermal signaling, descending modulation, reward and stress systems, and contextual meaning, while adding a testable account of how pleasure and relief arise when sensory input, bodily state, regulation, and context become aligned for the recipient. The same pressure, stroking velocity, warmth, or cold may feel soothing, neutral, intrusive, or aversive depending on expectation, perceived control, interpersonal trust, cultural familiarity, prior experience, and current bodily state. Relief is central to this account. In massage, sauna, bathing, and contrast exposure, positive affect often comes not only from pleasant stimulation itself, but from the easing of tension, pain, cold, heat, or bodily unease. The MIHR is presented as a testable framework rather than a validated mechanism. Future studies should manipulate sensory and contextual variables together, distinguish anticipation, stimulation, offset, and recovery phases, and combine subjective reports with autonomic, endocrine, and neurobiological measures. The model also separates immediate hedonic pleasure from broader eudaimonic wellbeing, which may emerge when repeated practices support recovery, agency, social connection, and a more secure relation to the body.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.