ArticleFrontiers in network physiology2026
Modular inhibitory coding in binary networks.
Article in Frontiers in network physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: We characterized properties of class of binary models where, as observed in biological networks, excitatory neurons are structurally and functionally separated from inhibitory units. We investigate the respective roles the two populations play in memory storage. Methods: The network is composed of separated excitatory and inhibitory layer. New patterns, represented as activation and inactivation of binary units in excitatory layer, are stored in the network through recruitment and training of inhibitory units that are grouped into individual modules and interact with excitatory layer. At the same time, the inhibitory modules compete for activation based on the signal magnitude they receive from the excitatory layer. Results: We show that inhibitory layer plays a critical role in memory storage and management, and that capacity of the network scales proportionally to number of inhibitory neurons. Further, we demonstrate that performance of the network is only gradually diminished when excitatory-to-excitatory (E-E) connections are removed but critically depends on inhibitory-to-excitatory (I-E) connections. We further show advantages of so designed coding scheme in terms of memory capacity, its expansion with progressive storage of new memories as well as network behavior for large memory loading. Discussion: These results are in line with new experimental work showing that inhibitory interneurons are playing critical role in memory storage and recall in the brain networks and may also address why generally excitatory networks exhibit sparser reciprocal connectivity as compared to connections to/from inhibitory units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.