ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
From Modic changes to the disc-endplate-bone marrow complex: imaging stratification, immune remodeling, and translational implications in intervertebral disc degeneration.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is frequently implicated in low back pain (LBP), yet the severity of degeneration on imaging often fails to parallel pain intensity or functional limitation. Modic changes capture abnormal marrow signal at the disc-vertebral interface, but they primarily describe subendplate marrow signal rather than lesion continuity across the disc, cartilaginous endplate, and adjacent marrow. The disc-endplate-bone marrow complex (DEBC) classification provides a complementary lesion-level imaging framework that integrates disc signal, endplate integrity, and adjacent marrow response. By incorporating short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences, DEBC may help identify imaging features suggestive of edema-like lesion activity; however, STIR hyperintensity should not be interpreted as direct proof of inflammation, pain generation, or a specific molecular program. This narrative and critical review synthesizes imaging, mechanistic, omics, and translational evidence to evaluate the biological plausibility and current limitations of the DEBC framework. We argue that DEBC should not replace Modic classification, assign pain causality, or guide treatment as a stand-alone criterion. Rather, its current value lies in generating testable hypotheses, improving lesion-level stratification, and supporting future imaging-to-molecular validation. Longitudinal imaging, histopathology, spatial omics, and clinical outcome studies are needed to determine whether DEBC types correspond to reproducible lesion ecologies, pain-associated phenotypes, or treatment-response patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.