ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
The effect of culturally tailored continuity of midwifery care on perinatal outcomes for women having a first Nations baby in Victoria, Australia: a prospective non-randomised translational study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perinatal morbidity and mortality are substantially higher for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter called First Nations) mothers and babies compared with non-First Nations peoples. Women birth in systems designed and informed by Western values, and many report negative interactions with health professionals and a lack of cultural safety in the mainstream maternity system. To redress unacceptable health outcomes and system challenges, we implemented a culturally tailored caseload midwifery care programme called Baggarrook Yurrongi, at three tertiary maternity services in Melbourne, Australia. The model included continuity throughout pregnancy, labour, birth and the early postnatal period, recognition of culture as central to identity, and respecting and acknowledging the cultural background, beliefs and values of First Nations peoples. This paper describes maternal and infant health outcomes. Methods: This prospective non-randomised translational study used routinely collected clinical outcome data to explore whether, for women expecting a First Nations baby, receiving the new model was associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with usual care prior to and since implementation (adjusted for age, Body Mass Index, marital status, parity, diabetes and hypertensive disorders). Specifically, would the model decrease the proportion of First Nations babies born low birthweight (<2500 g) and increase the proportion born 'healthy' (alive, at term, of normal weight and size, and not admitted to neonatal special or intensive care (NICU)). All births were included except multiple pregnancies, where babies had major congenital anomalies, and births occurring within the first six months of model implementation. Findings: Baseline data were from 2012 to model commencement (2017) (99,952 non-First Nations and 1159 First Nations births). 'After' data were collected to 2022 (62,499 non-First Nations and 1038 First Nations births), and 669/1038 eligible women (64.5%) received the Baggarrook Yurrongi model. Fewer First Nations babies whose mothers received the model compared with those who received usual care 'Before' were low birthweight (AOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47, 0.93) and more were born 'healthy' (AOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.14, 1.84). Interpretation: Culturally tailored caseload midwifery care significantly improved perinatal outcomes for women and their First Nations babies. Given poor perinatal outcomes are major risk factors affecting short- and long-term health, we recommend widespread model implementation, adapted to the needs of local First Nations communities, and supported by policymakers. Future research should include monitoring implementation and outcomes of the programme, along with robust cost-effectiveness analysis data to inform scale-up. Funding: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.