ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
High versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: impact on postoperative anastomotic leakage.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Whether preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during transanal total mesorectal excision is beneficial remains unclear. This study evaluated the effects of LCA-preserving low ligation versus high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery without LCA preservation on anastomotic leakage. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with low rectal cancer at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (January 2014-January 2024). After propensity score matching, 182 patients were assigned to LCA preservation (n = 91, low ligation) or non-preservation (n = 91, high ligation) groups according to whether the LCA was preserved. Perioperative characteristics, pathological findings, and incidence of anastomotic leakage were compared, and subgroup analyses were performed. Results: The incidence of postoperative leakage in the LCA preservation group was lower than in the non-preservation group (4.3% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.036). Among patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, LCA preservation was associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage rates (7.0% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.049). Discussion: LCA preservation may have clinical value in selected patients with low rectal cancer, particularly those receiving neoadjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.