ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Academic stress and academic engagement among Peruvian university students during their first experience with online learning.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The transition to fully online learning during the COVID-19 health emergency affected students' academic experiences. This study aimed to examine academic stress and academic engagement in 527 Peruvian university students during their first experience with online learning. Methods: Using a non-experimental, quantitative, cross-sectional, and correlational design, the study employed the adapted SISCO Inventory of Academic Stress and the Utrecht Engagement Scale for Students. Results: The results showed that 44.2% of students reported high levels of stress symptoms, 55.6% reported high levels of stressors, 65.5% reported high levels of coping strategies, and 42.3% reported high levels of academic engagement. Significant differences were found by sex, age, perceived learning achievement, and occupational status, but not by degree program or difficulties accessing virtual classes. Academic engagement and its dimensions were positively correlated with coping strategies and negatively correlated with stress symptoms but were not significantly correlated with stressors. Finally, the structural model showed that stressors, coping strategies, and academic engagement were jointly associated with 37.5% of the variance in stress symptoms. Discussion: In addition, coping strategies were positively associated with academic engagement, and academic engagement showed a weak mediation effect, particularly in the association between coping strategies and stress symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.