Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534799›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Robust nasality representation learning for cleft palate-related velopharyngeal dysfunction screening in real-world settings.

Weixin Liu, Bowen Qu, Amy Stone, Maria Powell, Shama Dufresne, Stephane Braun, Izabela Galdyn, Michael Golinko, Bradley Malin, Zhijun Yin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Weixin LiuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Bowen QuDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Amy StoneDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Maria PowellDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Shama DufresneSchool of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Stephane BraunDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Izabela GaldynDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Michael GolinkoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Bradley MalinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Zhijun YinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Matthew E PontellDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) is an impaired ability to achieve adequate velopharyngeal closure during speech, often resulting in hypernasality and reduced intelligibility. VPD screening and diagnosis require specialized expertise and controlled recording conditions, limiting scalable access outside high-income countries.Key challenge: Speech-based machine learning models can perform extremely well under standardized clinical recording conditions. However, performance often deteriorates when deployed on consumer devices (e.g., phones or tablets) and in uncontrolled acoustic environments. This degradation is largely driven by Methods: This study introduces a two-stage framework to improve robustness under realistic recording scenarios. Results: On the primary in-domain subject-disjoint held-out split of 82 subjects (60 train/22 test; 345 training recordings; 131 test recordings; multiple recordings per subject), the proposed approach reached ceiling recording-level screening performance under this standardized clinical protocol (macro-F1 = 1.000, accuracy = 1.000). To assess sensitivity to this fixed split, an additional subject-level nested 5-fold cross-validation analysis was performed on the full in-domain cohort (82 subjects, 476 recordings), with the encoder frozen and only the second-stage classifiers retrained; the best mean performance was obtained with SVM (macro-F1 = 0 Conclusion: Learning a nasality-focused representation prior to clinical classification can reduce sensitivity to recording artifacts and improve robustness when moving from the laboratory to real-world audio recording scenarios. This design supports practical deployment of VPD screening and motivates domain-robust evaluation protocols for deployable speech-based digital health tools.

Indexed as

cleft palatedigital screeningdomain shifthypernasalitymobile healthnasality representationsupervised contrastive learningvelopharyngeal dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID42534799
PMCPMC13422185

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.