Evidence mapPaperPMID 42534835Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026

New insight into RNA biomarkers in neuropathic pain: a clinician-neuroscientist roadmap to translational testing and treatment monitoring a clinical review.

Amol Soin, Massab Khaira, Aviraj Soin, Dhilen Soin, Shreyas Shah, Sabrina Tolppi, Anubhav Tripathi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amol SoinThe Ohio Pain Clinic, Centerville, OH, United States.
Massab KhairaThe Ohio Pain Clinic, Centerville, OH, United States.
Aviraj SoinThe Ohio Pain Clinic, Centerville, OH, United States.
Dhilen SoinThe Ohio Pain Clinic, Centerville, OH, United States.
Shreyas ShahLilac Biosciences, Providence, RI, United States.
Sabrina TolppiLilac Biosciences, Providence, RI, United States.
Anubhav TripathiBiomedical Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropathic pain affects an estimated 7%-10% of the global population and imposes an annual economic burden exceeding $600 billion in the United States alone. It lacks robust objective biomarkers; current diagnosis relies heavily on subjective reporting and heterogeneous phenotypes. Currently utilized pain assessment tools include the brief pain inventory (BPI), numerical rating scales (0-10 pain scores), and the visual analog score (VAS), which depend on patient-reported outcomes and are influenced by social, psychological and contextual factors. This subjectivity contributes to heterogeneous phenotyping and variability (>30%) towards the treatment response. Emerging transcriptomic and epitranscriptomic evidence suggests that RNA-based biomarkers may offer a biologically sound and objective approach to understanding and managing pain by capturing underlying molecular mechanisms. Therefore, the present clinical review focused on RNA biomarker classes (mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA, RNA editing, RNA modifications) and proposes a clinically deployable testing system for diagnosis, stratification, and treatment monitoring, since there are no FDA-approved RNA-based biomarkers for pain. Therefore, this review synthesizes evidence from immune-cell transcriptomic meta-analysis (TCL1A/ERAP2), dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and central nervous system gene expression patterns (EFNB2, GABBR1, NCAM1, SCN11A)/brain genetic architecture via single-cell omics integration, and atlas-driven frameworks, like iPain single-cell atlas of pain chronification and nociceptor senescence. Additional sources include studies on RNA editing mediator adenosine deaminase acting on RNA2 (ADAR2), clinical and translational evidence supporting miRNA biomarkers, and lncRNA axes (NEAT1/miR-183-5p; H19/miR-141) as tissue-specific regulatory nodes. Additionally, m6A epitranscriptomic modifications regulated by the METTL3/METTL14 writer complex and FTO/ALKBH5 erasers, with site-specific methylation of GRIN2B mRNA shown to upregulate GluN2B in dorsal horn neurons and augment central sensitization. These biomarkers also demonstrate potential utility as pharmacodynamic readouts in drug and neuro-modulation trials. Additionally, an emerging RNA workflow technology pathway leveraging rapid low-input RNA based assays was also explained. All evidence supports the idea that these biomarkers can provide complementary insight into the mechanisms underlying pain. Although current evidence supports the feasibility of RNA-based biomarkers as indicators of key biological processes, however, the current pain biology score remains at the theoretical model stage and has not been validated through

Indexed as

chronic paingenetic editinggenetic modificationmolecular biomarkerneuropathic painneuropathyprecision medicineRNA biomarker

Identifiers

PMID42534835
PMCPMC13422239

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.