ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Integrated single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing analyses identify a myeloid state-related gene signature for molecular subtyping in stomach adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) is characterized by significant heterogeneity, within which myeloid cells play crucial yet incompletely understood roles. The relationship between the functional states of myeloid cells, patient prognosis, and therapeutic response requires further elucidation. Methods: We integrated single-cell RNA-seq profiles and 443 bulk RNA-seq profiles from the TCGA-STAD cohort. By integrating myeloid cell differentiation trajectories inferred from Monocle2 pseudotime analysis with survival analysis, we identified myeloid state-related prognostic genes (MSRPGs) and constructed a molecular classification (STAD-MSC). We also explored its prognostic significance and multi-omics features. Additionally, we utilized correlation analysis to establish regulatory networks and predict candidate inhibitors. The 5-gene risk model was evaluated in a public 355-patient validation cohort, and the STAD-MSC framework was further assessed at the protein level in a 70-patient retrospective cohort using immunohistochemistry for NNMT, AXL, and COL1A1. Results: We identified 32 MSRPGs across five distinct myeloid states. Consensus clustering stratified the patients into three subtypes, including low immune infiltration STAD (LI-STAD), moderate immune infiltration STAD (MI-STAD), and high immune infiltration STAD (HI-STAD). The HI-STAD subtype, characterized by high immune infiltration accompanied by an immunosuppressive and dysfunctional microenvironment, exhibited the poorest overall survival (global log-rank p = 0.018). The multi-omics analysis revealed subtype-specific genomic and immune landscapes. A 5-gene prognostic signature was constructed and evaluated as a risk-associated prognostic model. In silico analysis identified subtype-associated differences in predicted drug response. Exploratory pharmacogenomic analysis revealed nominal associations for dabrafenib (p = 0.0051) and ruxolitinib (p = 0.041), suggesting potential subtype-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities. Importantly, the three-protein classifier (NNMT/AXL/COL1A1) stratified a retrospective 70-patient cohort into three subgroups with significantly different OS and PFS. Conclusion: Using public-cohort and protein-level clinical validation, we established STAD-MSC, a myeloid state-centric molecular taxonomy that stratifies STAD patients into subgroups with distinct prognoses and immunosuppressive microenvironmental features, providing a framework for immune-informed patient stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.