ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in infants with severe infections.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare pathogen detection rates between metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and conventional microbiological culture in critically ill infants younger than 1 year of age, and to investigate the associations between mNGS positivity and clinical laboratory parameters. Methods: We conducted a single-centre retrospective study including infants with severe infections admitted to the Children's Hospital of Soochow University between 1 January 2023 and 31 December 2025, who underwent both mNGS and conventional culture testing. Patients were classified into mNGS-positive and mNGS-negative groups, and clinical characteristics and laboratory findings were compared between groups. Candidate predictors of mNGS positivity were identified using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, followed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. The predictive performance of key variables was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: A total of 105 infants and 153 biological specimens were included. The overall mNGS positivity rate, as well as positivity rates across all specimen types except cerebrospinal fluid, were significantly higher than those of conventional culture ( Conclusion: mNGS demonstrated superior pathogen detection compared with conventional culture in critically ill infants. MCH, cholinesterase, and PCT were independently associated with mNGS positivity, and a combined multi-marker model substantially improved the prediction of mNGS-positive cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.