ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Prenatal PFAS exposure and offspring health: evidence review and implications for intergenerational risk assessment.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prenatal exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) represents a critical developmental concern because several PFAS cross the placenta and may perturb biological programming during sensitive windows. Although epidemiological and experimental studies have linked prenatal exposure to several measured PFAS, primarily legacy perfluoroalkyl acids such as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), Perfluorohexane Sulfonic Acid (PFHxS), and Perfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA), to diverse offspring outcomes, the strength of evidence differs substantially across compounds and health domains. Current human evidence is strongest for impaired vaccine antibody responses and altered growth or metabolic trajectories in studies dominated by legacy PFAS, whereas evidence for other congeners, short-chain PFAS, ether-based alternatives, and fluorotelomer compounds remains sparse. Mechanistically, placental transfer, nuclear receptor perturbation, thyroid hormone transport disruption, mitochondrial stress, immune modulation, and epigenetic reprogramming may jointly contribute to developmental susceptibility. We further discuss how emerging PFAS alternatives and real-world mixture exposures challenge single-chemical and adult-centered assessment paradigms. Finally, we outline a conceptual framework for developmental hazard assessment, in which exposure-window characterization, congener-specific toxicokinetics, human-relevant models, multi-omics biomarkers, and PBPK/PBTK modeling are positioned as complementary components rather than as a fully operational assessment system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.