ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Structural brain changes in the development of essential tremor: toward early diagnosis.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Essential tremor (ET) is the most common movement disorder. Its etiology and neuropathology remain controversial, but could be clarified with neuroimaging. Objectives: This study investigated brain structures derived from T1-weighted MRI associated with tremor severity in analyses focusing on the motor circuit and whole-brain to test competing hypotheses. Methods: Structural MRI at 3T was acquired from 50 ET participants and 50 healthy controls (HC). Voxel-based morphometry and surface-based processing generated measures of brain structure. Three two-group comparisons were undertaken: 1) HC versus ET participants; 2) HC versus ET participants with low tremor; and 3) HC versus ET participants with high tremor. For ET participants, correlations with tremor severity were also explored. Results: Within the motor circuit and across the whole brain, no significant case-control differences were observed after correction. Likewise, vertex-wise analyses of cortical volume, cortical thickness, and gyrification did not reveal significant differences. Uncorrected voxel-wise analyses suggested subtle reductions in the cerebellum and the motor circuit, particularly in ET participants with greater tremor severity. However, these effects were generally small and not consistently observed across analyses. Conclusion: The present analysis showed that ET severity was associated with weak structural differences, mainly within the motor circuit, although these findings did not survive correction. Consistent with previous literature, structural MRI abnormalities in ET appeared subtle and heterogeneous across studies, potentially becoming more detectable in patients with more severe symptoms. Although not designed to assess disease progression directly and noting that no finding survived correction for multiple comparisons, the direction of uncorrected exploratory trends within the motor circuit is consistent with the hypothesis of progressive structural alterations; however, this interpretation remains speculative and requires replication in larger, longitudinal cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.