ArticleBMJ public health2026
How do ethnic minority women navigate family planning amid symbolic violence? A qualitative study among Kinh and Mong communities in the highlands of Vietnam.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In ethnic minority communities like in Vietnam, reproductive decision-making is shaped not only by access to services but by deeply rooted cultural and gender norms. A stark 'reproductive paradox' emerges, where high fertility is idealised yet unsafe abortion remains prevalent. Objectives: This study explores how women, men and healthcare workers in Son La province perceive family planning and gender-based violence (GBV), with attention to the structural and symbolic forces that shape the reproductive autonomy of the women in the region. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in March 2022 in Son La province, using semistructured interviews and three group discussions with 18 participants, including mothers, fathers, pregnant women and healthcare workers from both Kinh and Mong ethnic groups. Data were analysed using Krippendorff's content analysis, framed by Social Constructionism and Symbolic Interactionism, to understand how cultural narratives shape Kinh and Mong women's reproductive autonomy. Results: Participants described how women's reproductive autonomy is constrained by structural and symbolic violence. Contraceptive choices were often controlled by husbands and mothers-in-law. Some women rejected intrauterine devices to avoid affecting male sexual comfort. 'Wife snatching' and early marriage were normalised as tradition. While both ethnic groups preferred large families, Kinh participants cited lineage expectations, whereas Mong participants emphasised ancestral blessings and land. Unsafe abortion, through herbal or informal methods, was common when women's choices conflicted with stigma or family control. Conclusions: Findings underscore how gendered and ethnic hierarchies restrict reproductive autonomy of Kinh and Mong women in the region. Interventions should integrate family planning and GBV services, promote cultural humility and engage local actors in codesigning solutions that respect both biomedical and indigenous reproductive logics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.