ArticleClinical and translational science2026
CYP2C19 c.681G>A Is not in Complete Linkage Disequilibrium With c.332-23A>G: Implications for Pharmacogenetic Testing.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CYP2C19 plays an important role in the metabolism of many medications, including the antiplatelet agent clopidogrel, the antifungal agent voriconazole, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, select tricyclic antidepressants, and proton pump inhibitors. The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium has published several guidelines emphasizing the importance of CYP2C19 genotype-guided therapy to optimize patient outcomes. Formerly, the no function CYP2C19*2 allele was defined by three variants, c.332-23A>G (splice defect), c.681G>A (splice defect), and c.991A>G (p.I331V). The discovery of two new haplotypes, one containing only a single variant, c.681G>A, and another with only c.681G>A and c.991A>G, challenged the assumption that c.681G>A always occurred together with c.332-23A>G. PharmVar designated these new haplotypes as CYP2C19*2.018 and *2.019, respectively, prompting the revision of the CYP2C19*2 core allele to be defined solely by the single variant, c.681G>A. Although the variants interrogated to identify CYP2C19*2 and *35 remain the same, subjects who are heterozygous for c.332-23A>G (present on most CYP2C19*2 and all *35 alleles) and c.681G>A (present on all CYP2C19*2 alleles) may, in rare cases, have a CYP2C19*2/*35 poor metabolizer diplotype (variants in trans) and not a CYP2C19*1/*2 intermediate metabolizer diplotype (variants in cis). CYP2C19*2 alleles with c.681G>A, but not c.332-23A>G, were found in subjects across diverse populations and are estimated to have a frequency around 0.03%. These findings, along with the revision of the CYP2C19*2 core allele definition, have implications for variant testing, test interpretation and reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.