ReviewCancer2026
Hypofractionated preoperative radiotherapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma: Are we racing ahead of the toxicity data?
Review in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For patients who have localized, high-risk soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity, combined-modality local treatment with radiation therapy (RT) and surgery offers high rates of local control. When RT is used, preoperative RT is recommended. The current standard of care dosing is 50 Gray (Gy) conventionally fractionated, delivered as 2 Gy per fraction for 25 fractions. Recent interest in shorter courses of preoperative RT has led to several investigations, mostly phase 2 trials, of various ultrahypofractionated and moderately hypofractionated regimens. Those studies demonstrated that, when the preoperative RT dose is estimated to be radiobiologically equivalent to or higher than the 50 Gy conventional standard, local control is commensurate. Major wound complication rates are also acceptable. Differences in toxicities with hypofractionation emerge when the daily fractional dose increases, particularly with regard to delayed wound closure beyond 180 days from surgery and amputations for treatment-related complications. Long-term assessment of bone toxicity is also warranted. A randomized controlled trial of hypofractionation versus the conventionally fractionated standard is needed and must include a composite toxicity co-primary endpoint that includes not only fibrosis, edema, and joint limitation but also delayed wound closure, fracture, and limb loss. Because local control is excellent with the current standard RT and surgery, functional and quality-of-life outcomes are paramount when assessing potential changes in RT approaches. To ensure a patient-centered approach to investigating hypofractionation for soft tissue sarcoma, patient and patient advocate perspectives should be included in clinical trial design and the selection of outcomes measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.