ArticleJournal of medical systems2026
Automated Multi-Label Adverse drug Reaction Extraction from Malaysia's National Pharmacovigilance Narratives.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracting multiple adverse drug reaction (ADR) terms from unstructured narratives remains challenging, particularly under severe label imbalance that limits the detection of rare ADRs. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a multi-label natural language processing framework for automated ADR extraction within Malaysia's national pharmacovigilance reporting system. We evaluated classical machine learning and transformer-based models within a common framework, incorporating domain-specific preprocessing and imbalance-aware optimization strategies to improve the detection of rare ADRs. The framework was applied to 28,980 real-world ADR narratives annotated with 80 Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Preferred Terms (PTs) from the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders System Organ Class (SOC). Performance was evaluated using micro-F1, macro-F1, precision, recall, and label coverage using a predefined 80/20 train-test evaluation strategy, complemented by pharmacist pilot review. Transformer-based models achieved the strongest performance, with the augmented model attaining a micro-F1 of 0.88, macro-F1 of 0.55, recall of 0.88, and the highest label coverage, correctly predicting 60 of 80 PTs (75%). However, a 70/10/20 sensitivity analysis on the improved transformer model yielded lower micro-F1 and precision, highlighting the impact of further data partitioning on model performance. Improved classical models also showed substantial gains over their baseline models, particularly in micro-F1, macro-F1, recall, and label coverage, consistent with improved detection of rare ADRs. During the pilot review, pharmacists accepted the model-preselected PTs without modification in 19 of 25 narratives (76%), while additional PTs were added in the remaining cases. Although the study was limited to a single SOC and one national pharmacovigilance database, the findings demonstrate that optimization strategies, domain-specific feature enrichment, and targeted augmentation can substantially improve multi-label ADR classification under severe imbalance. These findings support further evaluation of AI-assisted pharmacovigilance with pharmacist oversight in real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42536121What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.