Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536133›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026

Counseling and use of surrogacy among cancer survivors (CUSACS).

Alexa Steckler, Christina A Raker, May-Tal Sauerbrun-Cutler, Stephanie L Graff, Don S Dizon, Christine Duffy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexa StecklerThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. asteckler27@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7527-1137
Christina A RakerEpidemiology, Research Design, and Informatics (BERDI), Brown University Health Biostatistics, Providence, RI, USA.
May-Tal Sauerbrun-CutlerThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Stephanie L GraffThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Don S DizonTufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Christine DuffyThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInternational guidelines recommend fertility counseling at diagnosis for all women with cancer of child-bearing potential, yet whether gestational surrogacy (GS) is included in such counseling is not clear, nor is whether and what proportion of survivors are aware of GS. We assessed the counseling and use of GS, and predictors of oncologist-provided GS counseling among female cancer survivors.

methodsA survey on fertility and GS counseling was distributed via national advocacy organizations (April-November 2024). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression evaluated predictors of GS counseling.

resultsA total of 519 participants were included. Median age at diagnosis was 32. Most participants had breast (61.5%) or hematologic (14.5%) cancers; 58.2% of participants learned about GS at diagnosis, most often from non-clinical sources (73.2%), including internet/social media (46.0%). Among those aware of GS at diagnosis (n = 302), 134 (44.5%) considered it. Of these, 20 (14.9%) pursued GS, and 16 (80%) ultimately had a child using GS. Commonly cited barriers included cost (45.3%), not ready to build a family (41.4%), and preference to carry the pregnancy (29.9%). While 82.1% remembered receiving counseling on fertility risk, 18.7% recalled GS being included in the conversation. Younger patients without children and those with gynecologic cancers were more likely to receive oncologist-led GS counseling.

conclusionFewer than one in five survivors recalled GS counseling from their oncologist at diagnosis, with most learning from non-clinical sources. Predictors of oncologist-led GS counseling included younger current age, having no children, and gynecologic cancers. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: These findings highlight the need for improved family-building counseling at cancer diagnosis, including GS.

Indexed as

Family buildingGestational carrierOncofertilitySurrogacy

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.