Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536268›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026

Making Corneal Sensation Testing Accessible: Bench Validation of a Low-Cost Adjustable Monofilament Aesthesiometer.

David Maskill

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David MaskillHarrogate District Hospital, Harrogate, UK. d.maskill@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8276-217X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCorneal sensation testing is essential for diagnosing and monitoring neurotrophic keratopathy, yet the gold-standard Cochet-Bonnet (COBO) aesthesiometer (>£1000) is unavailable in most ophthalmology departments. The cotton wisp alternative is qualitative and insensitive to early sensory loss. This study evaluated whether a generic adjustable monofilament corneal aesthesiometer (GAMCA) fabricated from commodity materials could replicate COBO performance.

methodsThe GAMCA comprised a 0.12 mm nylon monofilament of adjustable length on a millimetre-scaled sliding carrier, constructed for £10.28. Two independently fabricated devices were validated across 12 lengths (5-60 mm, 20 measurements each) against published humidity-corrected COBO reference pressures using precision balance and corneal phantom testing. Agreement was assessed by standard-error weighted log-transformed Bland-Altman analysis with supporting regression and correlation statistics.

resultsBoth devices produced monotonically increasing pressure-length relationships consistent with beam mechanics. Coefficient of variation ranged from 11.0% to 19.9%. Rank-order correspondence with COBO was near-perfect (Pearson's r = 0.998-0.999; Spearman's ρ = 1.00; Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.849-0.869). Geometric mean bias was ×1.22 (95% limits of agreement ×0.939 to ×1.576) at 60% humidity and ×1.41 (×1.177 to ×1.680) at 50% humidity.

conclusionsA corneal aesthesiometer replicating COBO mechanical principles can be constructed for approximately 1% of its cost, with preserved rank-order fidelity and acceptable repeatability across clinically relevant pressures. This device could be suitable for community screening, ward-based settings and resource-scarce environments. Prospective clinical validation of reproducibility and threshold detection in normal and hypoaesthetic corneas are now warranted.

Indexed as

CorneaDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalSensationSensory ThresholdsEquipment DesignHumansReproducibility of ResultsAesthesiometryCorneal sensitivityDiagnostic techniques and proceduresInstrumentationNeurotrophic keratopathyOcular surface

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.