ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026
Making Corneal Sensation Testing Accessible: Bench Validation of a Low-Cost Adjustable Monofilament Aesthesiometer.
Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCorneal sensation testing is essential for diagnosing and monitoring neurotrophic keratopathy, yet the gold-standard Cochet-Bonnet (COBO) aesthesiometer (>£1000) is unavailable in most ophthalmology departments. The cotton wisp alternative is qualitative and insensitive to early sensory loss. This study evaluated whether a generic adjustable monofilament corneal aesthesiometer (GAMCA) fabricated from commodity materials could replicate COBO performance.
methodsThe GAMCA comprised a 0.12 mm nylon monofilament of adjustable length on a millimetre-scaled sliding carrier, constructed for £10.28. Two independently fabricated devices were validated across 12 lengths (5-60 mm, 20 measurements each) against published humidity-corrected COBO reference pressures using precision balance and corneal phantom testing. Agreement was assessed by standard-error weighted log-transformed Bland-Altman analysis with supporting regression and correlation statistics.
resultsBoth devices produced monotonically increasing pressure-length relationships consistent with beam mechanics. Coefficient of variation ranged from 11.0% to 19.9%. Rank-order correspondence with COBO was near-perfect (Pearson's r = 0.998-0.999; Spearman's ρ = 1.00; Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.849-0.869). Geometric mean bias was ×1.22 (95% limits of agreement ×0.939 to ×1.576) at 60% humidity and ×1.41 (×1.177 to ×1.680) at 50% humidity.
conclusionsA corneal aesthesiometer replicating COBO mechanical principles can be constructed for approximately 1% of its cost, with preserved rank-order fidelity and acceptable repeatability across clinically relevant pressures. This device could be suitable for community screening, ward-based settings and resource-scarce environments. Prospective clinical validation of reproducibility and threshold detection in normal and hypoaesthetic corneas are now warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42536268What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.