Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42536504›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2026

Predicting Care Needs in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Using Explainable Machine Learning and a Multidimensional Approach Integrating Health, Social, and Environmental Factors: Cross-Sectional Study.

Hyeri Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hyeri ShinAgeTech-Service Convergence Major, Department of Gerontology, Kyung Hee University, 1732, Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 17104, Republic of Korea, 82 312012940.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5198-9152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rapid population aging and a worsening shortage of care workers necessitate the identification of older adults who require proactive interventions. Although machine learning (ML) has been increasingly applied in gerontology, existing studies have predominantly focused on social isolation, loneliness, depression, falls, and frailty in isolation rather than on the integrated construct of care needs. Objective: This study aimed to develop and interpret an explainable ML model that identifies care needs in community-dwelling Korean older adults. Beyond physical health indicators such as disease and functional status, this study adopted a comprehensive approach that included mental health, cognitive function, health behaviors, and socioenvironmental determinants, such as social participation, social support, and the housing environment, to present an integrated model encompassing both health and social care needs. Methods: Data were obtained from the 2023 Korea Senior Survey, a nationally representative sample of 10,078 community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and older. The data were split 70:30 into training (n=7054) and held-out test (n=3024) sets. Seven algorithms were compared (logistic regression, decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, gradient-boosted decision trees, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting machine) using stratified 5-fold cross-validation on the training set. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model interpretability used Shapley additive explanations with bootstrap stability assessment across folds. Results: Model A (excluding activities of daily living or instrumental activities of daily living [IADL]) achieved good discrimination (AUC 0.892, 95% CI 0.866-0.918), adequate calibration (calibration slope=0.826), and positive clinical net benefit, demonstrating that upstream factors alone can identify older adults with care needs without relying on functional status. Shapley additive explanations analysis identified age, nutritional risk, employment status, depressive symptoms, self-rated health, cognitive function, household income, and home modification as the leading predictors, with high rank stability across cross-validation folds. Model B (including activities of daily living or IADL) yielded a higher AUC (0.976, 95% CI 0.962-0.989), but this reflected the near-tautological relationship between IADL and self-reported care needs rather than genuine upstream predictive value. Using an objective composite outcome yielded equivalent discrimination (AUC 0.892), supporting robustness to the outcome definition. Conclusions: Explainable ML models offer high predictive accuracy and strong interpretability for identifying care needs among older adults. Care needs in community-dwelling Korean older adults can be identified with good discrimination, calibration, and clinical net benefit using multidimensional nonfunctional factors alone. By highlighting the significant roles of health, social, and environmental factors, this study provides empirical evidence to support evidence-based decision-making for the Long-Term Care Insurance system and integrated community care policies.

Indexed as

Independent LivingMachine LearningNeeds AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overAging in PlaceBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom Forestcare needsexplainable AIlong-term caremachine learningolder adults

Identifiers

PMID42536504
PMCPMC13430952

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.