ArticlePloS one2026
'Us and them': A realist interview study exploring how and why health system factors influence dentists' participation in state funded, contracted primary dental care for low-income populations in Ireland.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo identify and explain the health system factors influencing private general dental practitioners (GDPs) engagement in state-funded, contracted primary oral healthcare for low-income adults in Ireland, in which circumstances, for which groups, how and why.
methodsNineteen realist interviews were conducted with frontline GDPs, health system actors and academic subject experts from Ireland and elsewhere. Collected data were then transcribed, coded, and analysed to generate context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) and develop an overarching realist programme theory to explain causation.
resultsThirteen individual and abstracted CMOCs were crafted and subsequently consolidated into five high level CMOCs. GDPs' engagement with state funded care is influenced by a myriad of complex health system contextual factors. These include low political and resource commitment to oral health; cost containment measures characterised by limited and outdated baskets of care and low remuneration; overtly bureaucratic oversight or contract administrative processes; adversarial communications and the absence of consultative mechanisms between the health system and GDPs. Other factors such as oral healthcare 'market' dynamics, GDPs' professional networks and community ties can also influence engagement in state care.
conclusionAs Ireland looks to reform its primary oral healthcare system to widen population access to care and meet national oral health policy and WHO commitments on oral health, the findings of this study provide health system leaders with evidence to leverage system change and increase or sustain GDPs' engagement in state care. Leveraging such change has the potential to improve access to care for vulnerable populations and reduce oral health inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.