ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
A Dynamic Graph-Based Multiobjective Optimization Method for Physician Recommendation: Development and Evaluation Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Online health care consultation provides patients with broad access to physicians, but also presents the challenge of selecting a suitable doctor in the absence of triage guidance. Patients have multifaceted needs, prioritizing not only recommendation accuracy but also physician service quality, and diversity of physician expertise. Furthermore, the sparsity of patient interaction data intensifies the difficulty of providing balanced and effective recommendations. Objective: This study aims to develop a multiobjective physician recommendation method that simultaneously optimizes recommendation accuracy, service quality, and diversity of physician expertise while addressing the data sparsity challenge inherent in online health care platforms. Methods: We propose dynamic graph-based bacteria colony optimization for multiobjective physician recommendation (DyGMO-PR), a dynamic graph-based multiobjective optimization method. It integrates bacterial colony optimization with an evolving physician relationship graph. Our approach features a novel graph-based encoding scheme, a chemotaxis-inspired graph-walking strategy for stable search, and a dynamic graph evolution mechanism that learns implicit physician relationships to enhance recommendation quality under sparse data conditions. Results: Evaluation on a real-world dataset comprising 10,493 consultation records from 1256 patients and 1377 physicians demonstrates the effectiveness of DyGMO-PR. Our method consistently outperforms 6 state-of-the-art multiobjective recommendation algorithms. Using a recommendation list length of 6 as an example, DyGMO-PR achieves an accuracy of 0.876, a service quality of 0.873, and a diversity of 0.720, surpassing the best-performing baseline by 7.4%, 3.1%, and 8.1%, respectively. DyGMO-PR also attains the highest hypervolume value (0.696 at K=6) and the highest recall (0.380 at K=6). Case studies and graph analysis further demonstrate the method's effectiveness in generating interpretable and balanced recommendation lists. Conclusions: DyGMO-PR offers an effective solution for multiobjective physician recommendation. It provides a flexible and practical foundation for building more responsive and reliable recommender systems in online health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.