ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Cardiovascular safety of psilocybin in psychiatric practice: a narrative review.
Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePsilocybin-assisted interventions are moving from efficacy trials toward psychiatric implementation. Cardiovascular interpretation is central to this transition because trial participants are generally medically selected, receive standardized pharmaceutical-grade doses, and are monitored more intensively than many patients encountered in routine care. This review translates the cardiovascular evidence into a risk-stratified psychiatric decision framework.
methodsWe conducted a structured narrative review of clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, cardiovascular pharmacology, drug-interaction studies, product-standardization literature, and implementation guidance. Searches were updated through July 10, 2026. Evidence was selected purposively to address acute hemodynamics, corrected QT interval (QTc), 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor-mediated effects, valvular biology, repeated exposure, naturally derived product variability, and practical screening and monitoring.
resultsIn supervised studies, pooled estimates indicate mean increases of approximately 19.0 mmHg in systolic blood pressure and 8.7 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure. The largest and most consistent group differences occur about 60-90 min after dosing and generally resolve within 4-6 h; heart-rate effects are smaller and less consistent. Serious acute cardiovascular events remain uncommon in selected participants. Risk interpretation changes with cardiovascular comorbidity, interacting medications, repeated exposure, and non-standardized mushroom products, whose active-alkaloid content can vary by more than an order of magnitude. Mean QTc effects at standard exposure are small. A 5-HT2B-mediated valvular concern remains biologically plausible under chronic exposure, but assay results and exposure-margin estimates are heterogeneous and clinical valvular injury has not been established.
conclusionCurrent evidence supports monitored, intermittent administration of standardized psilocybin in carefully selected populations, not general cardiovascular reassurance across all products, exposure patterns, or psychiatric settings. Product identity, medication review, risk-stratified cardiovascular assessment, session monitoring, and explicit escalation pathways should be integrated into treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42538465What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.