ReviewForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Application of artificial intelligence in the determination of the postmortem interval: Systematic review of the literature and metaanalysis.
Review in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate estimation of the postmortem interval (PMI) is essential in forensic medicine for reconstructing the timeline and circumstances of death. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged in recent years as a promising tool to enhance this estimation through the analysis of complex biological data. This study aims to conduct a systematic review of recent advances in AI applied to PMI estimation, complemented by a meta-analysis assessing the predictive performance of commonly used AI models such as neural networks, ensemble models, and random forest, using the area under the curve (AUC) as the primary metric. A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for the period 2015-2025, identifying 16 eligible studies. The analyzed models integrated microbiological, proteomic, imaging, and spectroscopic data, achieving over 90% accuracy in several studies. The meta-analysis, based on five studies with comparable data, yielded a combined AUC of 0.94 (95% CI ((Confidence Interval): 0.81-1.08), with no significant heterogeneity or publication bias. These findings highlight the strong potential of AI-particularly when combined with multi-omics approaches-as a precise and robust method for PMI estimation. This approach addresses several limitations of traditional forensic methods, although certain technical and implementation challenges remain to be resolved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42538494What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.