ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Integrative risk mapping of musculoskeletal disorders among office workers: a hybrid Delphi-Fuzzy AHP approach.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) remain a major occupational health concern among office workers due to the combined effects of ergonomic, biomechanical, psychosocial, organizational, environmental, and individual factors.This study aimed to investigate and prioritize key risk factors contributing to musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among office workers using a structured Delphi-FAHP approach. In the first stage, a structured non-systematic literature review was conducted to identify an initial pool of risk factors. These factors were then refined and validated through a two-round Delphi process involving experts in occupational health and ergonomics. In the final stage, FAHP was applied to determine the relative weights of the main domains and sub-factors. A total of 42 risk factors were identified and categorized into six main domains.The results showed that ergonomic/workstation factors had the highest relative weight (0.223), followed by physical/biomechanical (0.195), psychosocial (0.195), organizational (0.190), environmental (0.145), and individual factors (0.050). At the sub-factor level, awkward postures (0.42), job stress (0.39), working hours and scheduling (0.38), and monitor-related factors (0.37) were identified as the most influential contributors to MSD risk.These findings emphasize the dominant role of workstation design and postural factors, while also focusing on the significant contribution of psychosocial and organizational dimensions. These findings provide a prioritized understanding of MSD risk factors in office environments, which can support more targeted ergonomic interventions and informed decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.