ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Practice patterns of strong opioid recommendations by palliative care consultation services in German hospitals (online survey).
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStrong opioids are central to effective symptom control in palliative care. In cases of complex symptom burden, primary care teams frequently rely on palliative care consultation services (PCCSs) for expert guidance. This survey explored the recommendations issued by hospital-based PCCS teams regarding the use of strong opioids in patients with advanced disease (e.g. clinical indications, opioid agent).
methodsA closed online survey was conducted via the SoSci Survey platform. All PCCS teams registered with the German Association for Palliative Medicine were invited to participate in November 2024, with a reminder sent three weeks later.
resultsThirty-nine PCCS teams participated (21 university hospitals, 18 general hospitals). All respondents agreed on the indication for strong opioids in cancer-related pain and dyspnea. Differences emerged regarding the use of opioids in patients with non-malignant conditions: although most PCCS considered opioids appropriate for dyspnea associated with pulmonary (n = 37) or cardiac disease (n = 33), non-cancer pain was less consistently endorsed (n = 20). Hydromorphone and morphine were the most commonly used opioids (> 30 services reporting frequent use), whereas the use of fentanyl, oxycodone, and buprenorphine varied widely across services.
conclusionsThere is consensus regarding the use of opioids in patients with cancer-related pain and dyspnea. The differing approaches to their use for symptoms caused by non-malignant conditions suggest varying clinical interpretations and underscore the need for further research and clearer guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.