ArticleTelemedicine reports
Patient Experience, Satisfaction, and Characteristics at a Capsule Telemedicine Clinic: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Telemedicine reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine is now integral to health care delivery in Saudi Arabia. This study assessed patient characteristics, visit contexts, and patient-reported experiences at a capsule telemedicine clinic. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 40 adult users of a capsule telemedicine clinic located within Masjid Al-Haram, Mecca, during a busy Ramadan Umrah period. Participants completed a questionnaire on demographics, visit context, satisfaction with services, clarity of results, and post-visit outcomes. Experience and outcome measures were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: The median age was 50 years. Umrah pilgrims and other visitors comprised 75% and 25%, respectively. Visit reasons were evenly split between feeling unwell and routine checkups (40% each), with 20% for follow-up of an existing condition. Patient experience was highly positive: 95% (95% CI, 84-99) rated the location convenient, and 100% (95% CI, 91-100) rated staff helpfulness, service efficiency, and result clarity as "Good." After teleconsultation, 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91-100) felt more confident about their health and would recommend the service. Twenty percent (8/40; 95% CI, 11-35) were referred for hospital evaluation, and no adverse events occurred. Exploratory subgroup comparisons suggested possible differences in referral patterns, but the small sample size precluded definitive inference. Discussion: Patients reported high satisfaction with the capsule telemedicine service during a Ramadan Umrah period. Most participants were not referred for immediate hospital evaluation, suggesting potential feasibility and acceptability in high-density pilgrimage settings. Further studies with clinical follow-up and objective outcome measures are needed to assess effectiveness and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.