ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Dominant odor-active events link plant volatile signals to human perception and behavioral intentions in urban smellscapes.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Urban smellscapes are important components of multisensory green-space experiences, yet quantitative links between plant volatile signals, odor perception, and behavioral responses remain poorly understood. Methods: We developed an olfactory event-based framework integrating GC-MS volatile profiling, odor activity value (OAV) analysis, ambient-air relative OAV indices, spatial-temporal attenuation assessment, semantic differential evaluation, and behavioral-intention modeling. Six ornamental species with contrasting odor profiles were analyzed to characterize chemical signals, perceptual responses, and stop-avoid intentions. Results: Perceived olfactory signatures were better explained by temporally dynamic subsets of dominant high-OAV compounds than by total volatile emissions. Dominant odor-active compounds exhibited species-specific emission rhythms and distance-dependent attenuation, defining distinct perceptible odor ranges across vegetation contexts. Semantic evaluation revealed that plant identity and odor recognizability primarily structured olfactory perception, while vegetation context influenced perceived intensity and affective responses. Cross-validated logistic regression identified two behavioral pathways: stop intention was associated with favorable semantic attributes and dominant OAV/relative OAV-based exposure indices, whereas avoid intention was associated with negative odor valence and complex background conditions. Discussion: These findings indicate that urban plant odors operate as discrete olfactory events shaped by chemical dominance, spatial persistence, perceptual interpretation, and contextual modulation. The proposed framework links odor-active compounds, atmospheric dispersion, human perception, and behavioral intention, providing a quantitative basis for odor-informed urban green-space design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.