ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Prescription patterns of sacubitril/valsartan among patients with hypertension in Japan.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is an established therapy for heart failure that has been recently approved for hypertension in Japan. However, evidence regarding its use in combination with other antihypertensive agents in real-world practice is limited. Objective: To describe real-world prescribing patterns of S/V among patients with hypertension in Japan. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using a nationwide Japanese electronic health record database (August 2020 to October 2023) identified adults with hypertension (ICD-10: I10-I15) who were newly prescribed S/V. Patients with heart failure were excluded. Concomitant antihypertensive medications, S/V dosing, and discontinuation patterns were assessed over 90 days following initiation. Results: Of the 9,486 patients (median age 79 years; 50.6% men), 63.6% received S/V with a calcium channel blocker (CCB), 22.5% as monotherapy, and 11.8% as triple therapy with CCB and thiazide. At day 90, 55.5% of patients received S/V plus a CCB, and 26.0% were on S/V monotherapy. The S/V discontinuation rate reached 11.8% by day 90. Approximately half of those on triple therapy discontinued the thiazide diuretic within 30 days. Conclusions: In Japanese patients with hypertension, S/V is most commonly used in combination with a CCB, although a notable proportion receive it as monotherapy. These findings highlight the need for further studies to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of S/V-based combination regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.