ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2026
Prediction of Pathological Complete Response after Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using Machine Learning with Clinical Features, the INTERCEPTOR Study Preliminary Model.
Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Organ-preserving strategies are increasingly used in rectal cancer for those achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), CRT may not significantly impact local recurrence or overall survival when an R0 resection is feasible. Accurate pretreatment prediction of pCR is critical to assist patients in deciding on CRT when it may not be oncologically required. The initial phase of the ongoing INTERCEPTOR study evaluated whether machine learning (ML) models using pretreatment clinical variables could improve pCR prediction beyond the baseline probability of 15-20%. Methods: Patients with LARC who received CRT followed by total mesorectal excision between 2004 and 2018 at a tertiary referral center were analyzed. Eligible patients received ≥25 fractions of CRT (50.0-50.4 Gy with concomitant capecitabine) and surgery ≥6 weeks after CRT. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were trained with 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity. Feature importance was assessed with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and XGBoost feature importance. Results: Among 238 included patients, 30 (12.6%) achieved pCR. The number of radiologically positive lymph nodes was the strongest single predictor, but with limited discriminative power (AUROC 0.65 ± 0.04, sensitivity 0.83 ± 0.15 and specificity 0.45 ± 0.1). Combining positive node count with additional clinical variables led to a modest improvement in performance. SHAP analysis confirmed positive lymph node count was the most influential predictor. Conclusion: Pretreatment clinical variables alone provide poor-to-fair accuracy for predicting pCR after CRT in LARC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.