Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539793›Full record

ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2026

Prediction of Pathological Complete Response after Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using Machine Learning with Clinical Features, the INTERCEPTOR Study Preliminary Model.

David Mens, Soogyeong Shin, Farhan Akram, Andrew Stubbs, Michail Doukas, Cornelis Verhoef, Denise Hilling, Jan von der Thüsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David MensDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Soogyeong ShinDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Farhan AkramDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrew StubbsDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michail DoukasDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Denise HillingDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan von der ThüsenDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Organ-preserving strategies are increasingly used in rectal cancer for those achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), CRT may not significantly impact local recurrence or overall survival when an R0 resection is feasible. Accurate pretreatment prediction of pCR is critical to assist patients in deciding on CRT when it may not be oncologically required. The initial phase of the ongoing INTERCEPTOR study evaluated whether machine learning (ML) models using pretreatment clinical variables could improve pCR prediction beyond the baseline probability of 15-20%. Methods: Patients with LARC who received CRT followed by total mesorectal excision between 2004 and 2018 at a tertiary referral center were analyzed. Eligible patients received ≥25 fractions of CRT (50.0-50.4 Gy with concomitant capecitabine) and surgery ≥6 weeks after CRT. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were trained with 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity. Feature importance was assessed with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and XGBoost feature importance. Results: Among 238 included patients, 30 (12.6%) achieved pCR. The number of radiologically positive lymph nodes was the strongest single predictor, but with limited discriminative power (AUROC 0.65 ± 0.04, sensitivity 0.83 ± 0.15 and specificity 0.45 ± 0.1). Combining positive node count with additional clinical variables led to a modest improvement in performance. SHAP analysis confirmed positive lymph node count was the most influential predictor. Conclusion: Pretreatment clinical variables alone provide poor-to-fair accuracy for predicting pCR after CRT in LARC.

Indexed as

complete responsemachine-learningrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID42539793
PMCPMC13424421

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.