Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42539846›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology

Comparative efficacy and safety of ab-interno XEN 45 gel implantation versus trabeculectomy for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muhammad Imaz Bhatti, Maria Qadri, Ariba Asif, Sana Iftikhar, Muhammad Safiullah, Erum Habib, Husam Abu Dawood, Hashem Abu Serhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad Imaz BhattiFaculty of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9381-0106
Maria QadriFaculty of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ariba AsifFaculty of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Sana IftikharFaculty of Medicine, Shaikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al-Nahyan Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad SafiullahFaculty of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Erum HabibDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Husam Abu DawoodFaculty of Medicine, Palestine Polytechnic University, Wadi Al-Hariyyah, Hebron P720, Palestine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3109-2600
Hashem Abu SerhanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Trabeculectomy remains the standard surgical treatment for glaucoma, but is associated with postoperative complications. XEN gel stent implantation has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, though comparative evidence regarding its efficacy and safety remains inconsistent. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of ab-interno XEN 45 gel stent implantation versus trabeculectomy in patients with glaucoma. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources and methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify studies comparing the XEN Gel Stent with trabeculectomy. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Eleven studies comprising 1260 eyes (645 XEN, 615 trabeculectomy) were included. Trabeculectomy achieved significantly greater intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction (MD: -2.16 mmHg (95% CI: -2.88 to -1.44); Conclusion: Trabeculectomy achieves greater intraocular pressure reduction and higher surgical success rates than ab-interno XEN45 gel stent implantation, whereas XEN is associated with lower rates of selected bleb-related complications. Procedure selection should be individualized according to target intraocular pressure, glaucoma severity, and postoperative management requirements. Trial registration: PROSPERO (CRD420251075034).

Indexed as

glaucoma managementglaucoma surgeryintraocular pressure (IOP)trabeculectomyXEN stent

Identifiers

PMID42539846
PMCPMC13424515

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.