ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2026
Can we now save the neck of OSCC T1-T2 patients? A narrative review of whether experimental techniques are on the way to clinical application.
Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The molecular pathogenesis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a complex process involving genetic alterations that accumulate over time. The clinical presentation and management of patients vary according to several pathological factors, but lymph node involvement is a key consideration in this context. Accurate lymph node staging in the neck is challenging because metastases may be present at an early stage of oral cancer. This narrative review assesses the evolution of imaging techniques over the last five years, distinguishing between research and established methods in order to address specific clinical questions. Conventional imaging techniques, including ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, are reviewed and compared with several noteworthy developments in optical and fluorescence imaging. In this scenario, various position papers and guidelines strongly suggest using scintigraphy for sentinel node biopsy. However, its use in clinical practice is not widespread. This is a direct result of unrelenting advances in imaging accuracy, treatment options and new diagnostic approaches. All these approaches are considered here, but none emerges as a universal solution. Overall, no single technique currently emerges as a universal solution. The most realistic strategy is an integrated, multidisciplinary pathway. Multimodal imaging integration framework and AI-assisted diagnostic strategy could provide a novel clinical decision-making pathway for cervical lymph node staging in T1-T2 stage OSCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.