ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2026
Patient awareness and perception of cardiovascular risk in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: results from an international survey.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are hallmarked by an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease compared with the general population. Evidence suggests that CV risk remains under-recognised and underdiscussed in routine care, although data on patient experience is lacking. We aimed to assess awareness, perceptions, and experiences regarding CV risk and prevention in patients with RMDs. Methods: An anonymous, online survey was codesigned by rheumatologists, researchers, and patient research partners in English language and translated into 9 languages. This was distributed through patient organisations/forums and social media. Results: A total of 951 patients with RMDs from 43 countries (mainly females, aged 50-70 years, and with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus) completed the survey. Although 68% of respondents acknowledged an increased CV risk in RMDs, and traditional CV risk factors were recognised by up to 60% of the participants, knowledge of disease-specific contributors (eg, disease activity) to CV risk was limited. Only 35% of respondents had ever discussed CV risk with a healthcare provider, mainly rheumatologists or cardiologists, and the content primarily focused on lifestyle advice. Lack of awareness on the topic relevance (38%), perceived complexity of the topic (25%), limited time of clinical visits (35%), and lack of informative materials (33%) emerged as the main key barriers among those poorly/not informed. Conclusions: This large, multinational survey demonstrates substantial gaps in CV risk awareness, knowledge, and patient-provider communication among patients with RMDs. These figures support the development of structured, patient-centred educational strategies and enhanced multidisciplinary communication schemes to improve CV prevention in RMDs.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.