ArticleBMJ nutrition, prevention & health2026
Persistent gaps in nutrition education in UK medical schools: a triangulated review of curricula, student perception and the evidence base.
Article in BMJ nutrition, prevention & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nutrition is a modifiable driver of morbidity and mortality in the UK, yet nutrition education remains marginal within medical curricula. Despite guidance from the General Medical Council (GMC) and the Association for Nutrition (AfN), evidence suggests persistent under-provision. Methods: We triangulated findings from: (1) a curriculum review and mapping exercise of UK medical schools; (2) a curriculum survey (n=31) of final-year or newly qualified students; and (3) a rapid review (2010-2025) of literature on nutrition education in UK medical programmes. Survey items mapped to AfN competencies and GMC Outcomes for Graduates. Results: Across all data sources, nutrition education was inconsistently delivered, theoretical and rarely assessed. Most students (71%) reported receiving ≤10 hours of teaching. Although 84% rated nutrition as important, only 61% felt prepared to address nutrition issues. Confidence was lowest for practical skills (nutrition assessment, referral pathways and brief interventions). The rapid review identified longstanding barriers: low curricular legitimacy, limited assessment, insufficient faculty expertise and weak clinical integration. Enablers included nutrition leads, interprofessional learning and competency-aligned teaching. Conclusions: Despite national prevention ambitions, nutrition remains insufficiently integrated into UK medical education. Aligning curricula with AfN/GMC standards, strengthening assessment, embedding leadership and co-designing applied teaching with students represent practical high-impact opportunities to develop prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.