Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540396›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026

Comparison of processing approaches for single-cell analysis of esophageal biopsy samples.

Paramita Dutta, Kevin Okamoto, Kira Chaiboonma, Carolyn H Baloh, Tanya M Laidlaw, Sourya Bhattacharyya, Ferhat Ay, Seema S Aceves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paramita DuttaLa Jolla Institute of Immunology, La Jolla, Calif.
Kevin OkamotoDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, La Jolla, Calif.
Kira ChaiboonmaDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, La Jolla, Calif.
Carolyn H BalohImmune Tolerance Network, Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Tanya M LaidlawImmune Tolerance Network, Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Sourya BhattacharyyaLa Jolla Institute of Immunology, La Jolla, Calif.
Ferhat AyLa Jolla Institute of Immunology, La Jolla, Calif.
Seema S AcevesDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, La Jolla, Calif.

Funding

Immune Tolerance Network UM1 2023 SupplementUM1AI109565 · NIAID · BENAROYA RESEARCH INST AT VIRGINIA MASON · PI Mark S Anderson, Jane Hoyt Buckner · 2014 to 2026
$451.6M
TWEAK/TNFSF12 and LIGHT/TNFSF14 interactions in allergic esophagitis remodelingR01DK114457 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Seema S Aceves, Ferhat Ay · 2018 to 2026
$4.5M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI109565NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis is an eosinophil-rich type 2 inflammatory disease with increasing global prevalence. Multicenter randomized trials are critical, but use of certain cutting-edge techniques, such as single-cell sequencing, can be challenging owing to a requisite need for immediate tissue processing. Methods: We performed a pilot single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) study using single esophageal biopsy samples in 3 processing protocols. Biopsy samples were processed as (1) fresh, (2) immediately frozen, or (3) frozen after dispersion to single cells. scRNA-seq was performed using 10× Genomics to understand cell type preservation despite freezing. Results: Biopsy samples from 4 patients were processed with 1 or more of each of the fresh and frozen protocols. Comparison of the scRNA-seq profiles of frozen samples with those obtained using the criterion standard of fresh biopsy samples demonstrated that epithelial and mast cell transcriptomes were preserved in frozen dispersed cells and frozen tissues. Lymphocytes, myeloid cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts were present in all of the fresh samples. Fibroblast, myeloid, and endothelial cells were lost in immediately frozen tissue but relatively preserved in tissue dispersed to single cells and then frozen. All 9 epithelial cell clusters present in the fresh samples were preserved in dispersed frozen cells but variably retrieved from directly frozen tissue. Conclusion: Single esophageal biopsy specimens can be used successfully in scRNA-Seq when samples are dispersed and frozen as single cells. Myeloid cell, endothelial cell, and fibroblast transcriptomes, as well as nondifferentiated epithelial cell transcriptomes, are not preserved when tissue samples are frozen without initial dispersion to single cells.

Indexed as

Eosinophileosinophilic esophagitisepithelial cellfibroblasttranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID42540396
PMCPMC13425826

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.