ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026
Comparison of processing approaches for single-cell analysis of esophageal biopsy samples.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis is an eosinophil-rich type 2 inflammatory disease with increasing global prevalence. Multicenter randomized trials are critical, but use of certain cutting-edge techniques, such as single-cell sequencing, can be challenging owing to a requisite need for immediate tissue processing. Methods: We performed a pilot single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) study using single esophageal biopsy samples in 3 processing protocols. Biopsy samples were processed as (1) fresh, (2) immediately frozen, or (3) frozen after dispersion to single cells. scRNA-seq was performed using 10× Genomics to understand cell type preservation despite freezing. Results: Biopsy samples from 4 patients were processed with 1 or more of each of the fresh and frozen protocols. Comparison of the scRNA-seq profiles of frozen samples with those obtained using the criterion standard of fresh biopsy samples demonstrated that epithelial and mast cell transcriptomes were preserved in frozen dispersed cells and frozen tissues. Lymphocytes, myeloid cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts were present in all of the fresh samples. Fibroblast, myeloid, and endothelial cells were lost in immediately frozen tissue but relatively preserved in tissue dispersed to single cells and then frozen. All 9 epithelial cell clusters present in the fresh samples were preserved in dispersed frozen cells but variably retrieved from directly frozen tissue. Conclusion: Single esophageal biopsy specimens can be used successfully in scRNA-Seq when samples are dispersed and frozen as single cells. Myeloid cell, endothelial cell, and fibroblast transcriptomes, as well as nondifferentiated epithelial cell transcriptomes, are not preserved when tissue samples are frozen without initial dispersion to single cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.