Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42540464›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026

Long COVID symptom profiles, workforce participation, and working hours among adults in England: a population-based cohort study.

Chiara Di Gravio, Viveka Guzmán, Shuang Wu, Emily Cooper, Clare Bambra, Nikki Smith, Alex Piper, Matthew Whitaker, Joshua Elliott, Christina J Atchison and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chiara Di GravioDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Viveka GuzmánDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Shuang WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Emily CooperDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Clare BambraPopulation Health Science Institute, Newcastle University, UK.
Nikki SmithREACT-LC, Public Advisory Group, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Alex PiperREACT-LC, Public Advisory Group, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Matthew WhitakerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Joshua ElliottDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Christina J AtchisonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Graham CookeUK National Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, UK.
Marc Chadeau-HyamDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Paul ElliottDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Helen WardDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Long COVID, marked by ongoing multi-systemic symptoms following COVID-19 infection, can impair ability to maintain employment. However, its relationship to workforce retention and working hours remains unclear. Methods: Long COVID was defined as symptoms lasting ≥12 weeks post-infection. We analysed data from a late-2022 follow-up survey involving 45,864 participants of the Real-time Assessment of Community Transmission (REACT) Study in England (median follow-up: 23 months). Hierarchical clustering identified symptom groups. Multivariable regressions examined associations between Long COVID, being in paid work, and changes in working hours. Findings: Of 45,864 participants employed at recruitment, 86% (N = 39,341) remained in paid work at follow-up and 11% (N = 4877) changed work hours. Approximately 4% (N = 1967/45,864) had unresolved Long COVID. Compared with participants with no/short (<4 weeks) symptoms, those with unresolved Long COVID had lower odds of being in paid work at follow-up (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 0.70), and higher odds of changing work hours (aOR: 4.34, 95% CI: 3.88, 4.85). Three clusters were identified: multisystem severe, fatigue-predominant and anosmia-predominant Long COVID. Compared with the fatigue-predominant cluster, participants with multisystem severe Long COVID had lower odds of paid work (aOR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.84) and higher odds of changing work hours (aOR 2.76, 95% CI 2.21, 3.46). Interpretation: Unresolved Long COVID was associated with worse employment outcomes. Symptom clusters highlighted the importance of considering heterogeneity in Long COVID when assessing workforce impacts and designing public health responses. Fundings: National Institute for Health and Care Research, UK Research and Innovation.

Indexed as

EmploymentEnglandLong COVIDREACT studySymptom clusters

Identifiers

PMID42540464
PMCPMC13425795

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.