ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Ideal birth spacing between the first and second child among reproductive-aged women in Shandong Province, China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to assess the ideal birth spacing between the first and second child among reproductive-aged women in Shandong Province and to examine its influencing factors using the Social Ecological Model. It was hypothesized that women's ideal birth spacing is influenced by factors at the individual, family, and sociocultural levels, with these factors exerting different effects across categories of ideal birth spacing. Methods: A multistage random sampling method was employed to obtain a sample of 2,090 women. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis and a generalized ordered logit model (gologit) were employed to identify factors associated with ideal birth spacing. Average marginal effects (AMEs) were calculated to interpret the magnitude of significant associations. Results: Among 2,090 participants, 46.32% preferred medium ideal birth spacing (3-4 years), 21.10% preferred short (0-2 years) and 32.58% preferred long spacing (≥5 years or no specific preference). Univariate analysis revealed that age, education level, marital status and fertility-related factors were significantly associated with ideal birth spacing ( Conclusion: Women's ideal birth spacing is shaped by multiple factors across individual, family, and sociocultural levels, with their effects differing across short, medium, and long spacing preferences. Policies aimed at reducing childcare burdens, improving policy awareness, and providing stage-specific support may help women better achieve their preferred reproductive timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.