Evidence mapPaperPMID 42540613Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2026

Shared decision-making in primary care: barriers and facilitators from the physician's and patient's perspectives: a scoping review.

Katarzyna Domosławska-Żylińska, Magdalena Krysińska-Pisarek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katarzyna Domosławska-ŻylińskaDepartment of Health Promotion and Implementation of Systemic Measures, National Institute of Public Health NIH-NRI, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena Krysińska-PisarekDepartment of Health Promotion and Implementation of Systemic Measures, National Institute of Public Health NIH-NRI, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Health-related communication and shared decision-making (SDM) are crucial elements of patient-centered care. The aim of this review was to identify the key barriers and facilitators influencing the adoption of an SDM approach from both the physician's and patient's perspectives in primary healthcare in relation to the 5-step model of SDM. Material and methods: A scoping review of resources published within the last 5 years was conducted in June 2024 in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Specific barriers hindering the adoption of SDM were identified, which can arise at any of the five steps. Results: The most common barriers include: time constraints and physician's workload, lack of SDM culture and tradition, paternalistic model of healthcare, and patients' passive attitude and belief they are unable to make decisions. SDM facilitators include: trust, use of educational materials by physicians, belief that SDM will lead to better treatment outcomes, and training in communication for physicians. Conclusions: Despite the challenges to public health, action should be taken to overcome these barriers, given the well-established benefits of SDM, although this will require time and necessary adaptations.

Indexed as

barrierscommunicationdoctor–patient relationshipfacilitatorsprimary careshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID42540613
PMCPMC13426165

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.