ArticleActa medica Philippina2026
Stroke and Methamphetamine Use: A Systematic Review.
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methamphetamine (MAP) use has been increasingly recognized as a potential risk factor for cerebrovascular disease; however, its association with different stroke subtypes and underlying mechanisms remains incompletely characterized. Objective: This study aims to systematically review the recent literature on the association between MAP use and stroke, including ischemic and hemorrhagic subtypes, as well as related vascular and cardiac pathology. Methods: A systematic search of studies published between 2020 and March 2026 was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Data on study characteristics, participant demographics, MAP use, and outcomes were extracted, and risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Findings were summarized descriptively and synthesized narratively. Results: Eight (8) studies were included, primarily retrospective cohort studies. MAP-associated stroke patients were mostly males that are younger than non-users with fewer vascular risk factors and comorbidities. MAP use was associated with increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and ischemic stroke. Aneurysm-related studies demonstrated higher aspect ratios and rupture at smaller sizes, suggesting increased vascular instability. MAP use was also linked to cardiomyopathy and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, contributing to cardioembolic stroke risk, as well as a higher burden of cerebral small vessel disease. Despite these differences, clinical outcomes in some cohorts were comparable to those of non-MAP stroke populations. Conclusion: MAP use is associated with both hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke and is linked to alterations in vascular and cardiac pathology. These findings highlight a distinct clinical phenotype and underscore the need for prospective studies better to define risk, mechanisms, and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.