SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
A multi-dataset single-cell meta-analysis of human keloid skin across Asian, Black and White populations reveals endothelial and mesenchymal programs linked to ethnic disparities.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Keloid is a fibroproliferative scar with marked ethnic disparities, disproportionately affecting Asian and Black populations. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) studies have mapped keloid pathology, but cross-study differences complicate generalization. We performed a meta-analysis to identify composition and transcriptional programs associated with keloid across ethnicities. Methods: We aggregated human skin scRNA-seq datasets containing keloid and healthy samples with documented ethnicity (Asian, Black, White). After quality control and batch integration (scVI/scANVI), we annotated cell types and subtypes. Differential abundance was estimated with scCODA, Milo, and propeller. Pseudobulk differential expression was meta-analyzed using random-effects models. Ligand-receptor signaling was inferred with CellChat/NicheNet. Results: The harmonized atlas comprised 112 donors, 147 samples, and 487,293 cells from 8 studies. Keloid demonstrated higher proportions of vascular endothelial cells and fibroblasts across all methods. Ethnicity-stratified analysis revealed endothelial expansion in Asian and Black relative to White populations, while fibroblast expansion was greater in White keloids. Endothelial subtyping showed increased post-capillary venules and arteriolar states. Fibroblast analysis revealed expansion of mesenchymal/ADAM12 Conclusion: Cross-study synthesis identifies shared and ethnicity-stratified endothelial and fibroblast programs in keloid. Expansion of post-capillary venules and ADAM12
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.