Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42541309›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

Performance comparison of downstream unit operations and process chains for the purification of amino acids for food, feed and pharma applications.

Maximilián Prachár, J F Buyel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maximilián PrachárBOKU University, Department of Biotechnology and Food Science (DBL), Institute of Bioprocess Science and Engineering (IBSE), Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
J F BuyelBOKU University, Department of Biotechnology and Food Science (DBL), Institute of Bioprocess Science and Engineering (IBSE), Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteinogenic amino acids are important supplements in foods, feeds, and pharmaceuticals. However, the development of cost-efficient and scalable platform downstream processes for multi-ton manufacturing of amino acids is complicated by upstream process heterogeneity resulting in plethora of implementations at laboratory and industrial scale. Here, we review 18 unit operations and analyzed >50 downstream processes reported over six decades to compare separation performance, sustainability and costs, highlighting process advantages and limitations. We find that chromatography is used in >65% of downstream processes, achieving purities >98% in different setups. Sustainable and cost-effective alternatives seem to challenge this position. For example, membrane separations can achieve purities of 60-98% with reduced environmental footprint, costs, and additional options for process integration, mainly for acidic and basic amino acids. Crystallization is frequently used for formulation and purification if >50 g L

Indexed as

ChromatographyFood supplementsLarge-scale manufacturingSmall molecule separationSustainable production

Identifiers

PMID42541309
PMCPMC13427518

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.